R-PMS System Use Cases : Model . R-PMS System - EPMS/KANPAV : System
Use Case - KANPAV-02 Calculate Federal Distress State Vector
link
| Properties |
| Name | Value | ||||||||||
| Description |
Calculates the Distress State Vector for Federal Highways within the State of Kansas |
||||||||||
| Transit From | |||||||||||
| Transit To |
|
||||||||||
| Id | UC29 | ||||||||||
| Abstract | false | ||||||||||
| Leaf | false | ||||||||||
| Root | false | ||||||||||
| Stereotypes | UseCase, Modeling | ||||||||||
| Justification | The Distress State of segments of the Highway are necessary for 1R and 3R processes | ||||||||||
| Business Model | false | ||||||||||
| Primary Actors | Actor - KDOT PMS Operator, Actor - KDOT PMS Modeler | ||||||||||
| Status | Identify | ||||||||||
| Rank | Unspecified | ||||||||||
| Relationships Summary |
| Extension Points |
| Name | Value | ||
| Name | Non Federal Criteria Augmentation | ||
| Sequence Number | -1 | ||
| Use Case Note |
| ■ Workflow - follow federal criteria and augment with additional criteria as a use case enhancement | |||
| • for each segment | |||
| ♦ grab data and convert the data in to a discrete value of distress on: | |||
| ♦ Roughness, rutting, Faulting, Percent Cracking | |||
| ♦ Enhance with TC, Joint Distress | |||
| ♦ magic here - basically turning those into a magic number and gets a level 1, 2, ,3 | |||
| ♦ Each variable turn into a good fair or poor | |||
| ♦ Combine all GFP into a distress state vector using an index (normalization) | |||
| ♦ such as roughness is below 90 etc see recording | |||
| ■ Decisions | |||
| • // Write down the decisions made during the meeting (e.g. Must allow accessing from mobile devices) | |||
| • Output is the distress state vector | |||
| • | |||
| for each segment |
| Steps | |||
|
1. |
|||
| 2. SYSTEM grab data and convert the data in to a discrete value of distress on: | |||
| 2.1. Roughness, rutting, Faulting, Percent Cracking | |||
| 2.1.1. Enhance with TC, Joint Distress | |||
| 2.1.1.1. magic here - basically turning those into a magic number and gets a level 1, 2, ,3 | |||
| 2.1.1.2. Each variable turn into a good fair or poor | |||
| 2.1.1.3. Combine all GFP into a distress state vector using an index (normalization) | |||
| 2.1.1.3.1. such as roughness is below 90 etc see recording | |||
| Details |
| Name | Value | ||
| Level | Subfunction | ||
| Complexity | Medium | ||
| Use Case Status | Initial | ||
| Implementation Status | Scheduled | ||
| Preconditions | |||
| Post-conditions | |||
| Author | Rick Miller and Jerry W. Manweiler, Ph.D. | ||
| Assumptions | |||
| Tagged Values |
| Name | Type | Value | |||
| Level | Ad Hoc Enumeration | ||||
| Complexity | Ad Hoc Enumeration | ||||
| Use Case Status | Ad Hoc Enumeration | ||||
| Implementation Status | Ad Hoc Enumeration | ||||
| Preconditions | Multi-line Text | ||||
| Post-conditions | Multi-line Text | ||||
| Author | Text | ||||
| Assumptions | Multi-line Text | ||||
| References |
| File Name | Description | ||
|
|
|||
| Relationships Detail |
| Name | Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| From |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| To |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Transit From |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract | false | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Final Specialization | false | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Leaf | false | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Visibility | Unspecified | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Derived | false | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Value | ||||||||||
| Name | |||||||||||
| From |
|
||||||||||
| To |
|
||||||||||
| Transit From |
|
||||||||||
| Visibility | Unspecified | ||||||||||
| Stereotypes | Extend | ||||||||||
| Name | Value | ||||||||||
| Name | |||||||||||
| From |
|
||||||||||
| To |
|
||||||||||
| Transit From |
|
||||||||||
| Visibility | Unspecified | ||||||||||
| Stereotypes | Include | ||||||||||
| Appears In |
| Diagram | |||
|
|
|||